Loading
Mahkahmah Konstitusi Sebagai Supremasi Penegakan Etika dan Hukum dalam Masa Pemilu yang Demokratis
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##
Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024) Articles

Mahkahmah Konstitusi Sebagai Supremasi Penegakan Etika dan Hukum dalam Masa Pemilu yang Demokratis

Published 2024-03-29
noor rahmad , Marsela Artika Sari Dewi
JATIJAJAR LAW REVIEW , Vol. 3, No. 1 (2024) , pp. 44-56 , Published: 2024-03-29
1 Universitas Muhammadiyah Gombong

Abstract

The role of the Constitutional Court is expected to function as a guardian of democracy, a goal that must be achieved as a democracy that upholds sovereignty. There are many rumors about electoral events and opinions that deeply touch on issues of ethics, morals and the philosophy of state democracy. With normative legal research methods which are based on legal principles, synchronization. By using a literature review to research this discussion. There are two things about election violations that must be understood as a society. The first is a process dispute and a result dispute. These two things are different things but influence each other. The ongoing election process influences the results and quality of the nation's democracy. Therefore, from the start, the process must be strictly monitored in terms of law enforcement and ethics so that it reflects the democratic valuesdesired by this people's democratic celebration that is already taking place. Correct enforcement of the constitution is enforcement of the constitution in a fair or just manner. Fair enforcement of the constitution is enforcement of the constitution which provides protection and benefits for every citizen in the context of upholding the supremacy of the constitution as the highest basic law of the state. Handling election disputes by the Constitutional Court (MK) is an important aspect in maintaining integrity and fairness in the democratic process.

Keywords

Constitutional Court Ethics and law enforcement General Elections Democracy

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Ashiiddiiqiiei, J. (2015). Konstiitusii Beirneigara. Jakarta : Seitara Preiss.
  2. Asshiidiiqqiiei, J. (2005). Modeil-Modeil Peingujujiian Konstiitusiional Beirbabagaii Neigara. Jakarta : Konstiitusii Preiss.
  3. Bachtiiar. (2015). Probleimatiika Iimpleimeintasii Mahkamah Konstiitusii. Jakarta: Raiih Asa Sukseis.
  4. Busro, A. D. (2015). Iilmu Neigara. Jakarta: Bumii Aksara.
  5. Mahkamah Konstiitusii RIi. (2004). Ceitak Biiru, Meimbangun Mahkamah Konstiitusii Seibagaii Iinstiitusii Yang Modeirn dan Beirtanggungjawab. Jakarta.
  6. Mamudjii, S. S. (1985). Peineiliitiian Hukum Normatiif Suatu Tiinjauan Siingkat. Jakarta: PT.Raja Grafiindo Peirsada.
  7. Paniitiia Ad Hoc Ii. (2000). Paniitiia Ad Hoc 1 Badan Peikeirja MPR RIi Untuk Peireisiiapan Peirubahan UUD 1945. Jakarta .
  8. Siiahaan, M. (2012 ). Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstiitusii. Jakarta: Siinar Grafiika.
  9. Jurnal
  10. Eindah, K. (2018). Eitiika Peimeiriintahan dalam Peilayanan Publiik. Modeirat: Jurnal Iilmiiah Iilmu Peimeiriintahan,4(1),141–151. https://doii.org/10.25147/modeirat.v4ii1.1088
  11. Ulya, N. U., & Musyarrii, F. A. (2020). Eivaluasii Yuriidiis Siisteim Peinyeileisaiian Seingkeita Peimiiliihan Umum Dan Iius Constiitueindum Peiradiilan Khusus Peimiiliihan Umum. Justiitiia eit Pax, 35(2), 153–175. https://doii.org/10.24002/jeip.v35ii2.2508
  12. Liiany, L. (2016). Deisaiin Hubungan Keileimbagaan Peinyeileinggara Peimiilu. Jurnal Ciita Hukum, 4(1), 51–72. https://doii.org/10.15408/jch.v4ii1.3198Nasruddiin,
  13. Hajrii, W. A. (2017). Quo Vadiis Piilkada Iindoneisiia. UIiR Law Reiviieiw, 1(2), 173–182. https://doii.org/10.25299/uiirlreiv.2017.1.02.562
  14. Chaniiago, P. S. (2016). Eivaluasii Piilkada Peilaksanaan Piilkada Seireintak Tahun 2015. Poliitiik Iindoneisiia: Iindoneisiian Poliitiical Sciieincei Reiviieiw, 1(2), 196. https://doii.org/10.15294/jpii.v1ii2.6585
  15. Siiboy A. (2021). Thei Iinteigratiion of thei Authoriity of Judiiciial Iinstiitutiions iin Solviing Geineiral Eileictiion Probleims iin Iindoneisiia. Leigaliity: Jurnal Iilmiiah Hukum, 29(2), 237–255. https://doii.org/10.22219/ljiih.v29ii2.15608
  16. Nanang Srii Darmadii, “Keidudukan Dan Weiweinang Mahkamah Konstiitusii Dalam Siisteim Hukum Keitataneigaraan Iindoneisiiaâ€, Jurnal Peimbaharuan Hukum, hlm.264

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Home Current Archives New Journal Search