Penerapan Prinsip Kehati-Hatian Dalam Valuasi Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Sebagai Jaminan Fidusia
Abstract
PENERAPAN PRINSIP KEHATI-HATIAN DALAM VALUASI HAK KEKAYAAN INTELEKTUAL SEBAGAI JAMINAN FIDUSIA
The Indonesian government passed Government Regulation No. 24 of 2022 concerning implementing regulations for Law No. 24 of 2019 on the Creative economy regulating Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) holders can apply for loans to banking institutions is a potential utilization of the creative economy. Banking institutions before providing capital analyze prospective debtors for loan approval. This research is a solution for banking institutions to apply IPR as a fiduciary guarantee, it needs government support to regulate the IPR valuation mechanism. This research applies normative legal research problem formulation: First, How is the Implementation of IPR as a fiduciary guarantee according to Bank Indonesia Regulation with Government Regulation on Creative Economy? Second, How is the Implementation of Prudential Principles of Fiduciary Financing of IPR as Fiduciary Guarantee? The results of this study found that the government emphasized the utilization of IPR in PP No. 24 of 2022 to provide access to IPR as a guarantee of financing. Bank Indonesia Regulation No.9/6/PBI/2007 as a rule for assessing the quality of assets of banking institutions guided by the prudential principle aims to minimize risk and does not find IPR as a collateral asset. The results of this study provide a view of the potential of the creative economy. PP No. 24 of 2022 states that the economic value of IPR is based on: (a) cost approach, (b) market approach, (c) income approach, (d) valuation based on applicable standards, so it can be used as a general reference to create an independent asset valuation institution in coordination with Banking Institutions.
Keywords
Downloads
Similar Articles
- Devika Claretta Angesti, Perlindungan Hukum Hak Korban Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual di Perguruan Tinggi , JATIJAJAR LAW REVIEW: Vol. 1 No. 2 (2022): JATIJAJAR LAW REVIEW
- Sulava Sururi Ramadhani, Urgensi Payung Hukum Tindak Pidana Medis dalam Upaya Penyelesaian Sengketa Medis , JATIJAJAR LAW REVIEW: Vol. 1 No. 2 (2022): JATIJAJAR LAW REVIEW
- Riza Abdul Hakim, Implementasi Undang – Undang No 33 Tahun 2014 Tentang Jaminan Produk Halal Kajian Teori Reflective-Law , JATIJAJAR LAW REVIEW: Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): JATIJAJAR LAW REVIEW
- Dimas Amal Kurniawan, Rahma Aliyah, Aditya Maulana Rizqi, Tanggung Jawab Hukum Bank Digital terhadap Perlindungan Konsumen di Indonesia , JATIJAJAR LAW REVIEW: Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): JATIJAJAR LAW REVIEW
- Aziza Aziz Rahamaningsih, Akuntabilitas APBN Pasca Pandemi Covid-19 Ditinjau dari Hukum Administrasi Negara , JATIJAJAR LAW REVIEW: Vol. 2 No. 1 (2023): JATIJAJAR LAW REVIEW
- Abdul Wahid, Rohadi Rohadi, Siti Sumartini, Disharmonisasi Kebijakan Politik Hukum Agraria: Analisis Hak Pengelolaan Tanah Pasca Terbitnya Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja , JATIJAJAR LAW REVIEW: Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024): JATIJAJAR LAW REVIEW
- Mahardina Pradnya Paramita, Astrid Devitasari, Prosawita Ririh Kusumasari, Perlindungan Data Pribadi dalam Perspektif Hukum Perdata: Urgensi, Tantangan, dan Prospek Pengaturan di Indonesia , JATIJAJAR LAW REVIEW: Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): JATIJAJAR LAW REVIEW
- Teddy Prayoga, Analysis Of Criminal Decisions In The Pinangki Sirna Malasari Corruption Case In Terms Of The Principle Of Justice , JATIJAJAR LAW REVIEW: Vol. 1 No. 2 (2022): JATIJAJAR LAW REVIEW
- Wisu vorizato Harita, Wahyu Adi Mudiparwanto, Analisis Perjanjian Kerja Waktu Tertentu Dan Perlindungan Hukum Pada PT. Telmark Integrasi Indonesia Dalam Perspektif UU No. 11 Tahun 2020 Tentang Cipta Kerja , JATIJAJAR LAW REVIEW: Vol. 2 No. 1 (2023): JATIJAJAR LAW REVIEW
- Luthfi Kalbu Adi, Implikasi Penolakan Penerbitan Surat Keterangan Ghaib Terhadap Hak Pencari Keadilan di Pengadilan Agama Purwokerto , JATIJAJAR LAW REVIEW: Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): JATIJAJAR LAW REVIEW
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.