Loading
Implikasi Penolakan Penerbitan Surat Keterangan Ghaib Terhadap Hak Pencari Keadilan di Pengadilan Agama Purwokerto
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##
Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025) • Articles

Implikasi Penolakan Penerbitan Surat Keterangan Ghaib Terhadap Hak Pencari Keadilan di Pengadilan Agama Purwokerto

Published 2025-09-30
Luthfi Kalbu Adi
JATIJAJAR LAW REVIEW , Vol. 4, No. 2 (2025) , pp. 101-112 , Published: 2025-09-30
1 Universitas Jenderal Soedirman

Abstract

A husband or wife who has been abandoned by their spouse without knowing their whereabouts has the right to file a lawsuit or request permission for a divorce decree to the Religious Court according to their domicile or place of residence. Filing for divorce through this scheme requires an administrative requirement in the form of a letter of absence issued by the village/sub-district office where the defendant last resided. However, not all village or sub-district offices have standard operating procedures (SOPs) for issuing these certificates, which can potentially hinder the rights of the Plaintiff/Applicant for Permission to Announce Divorce. This study aims to determine the procedure for issuing a certificate of absence and its implications for the rights of those seeking justice. This study uses a normative empirical approach, which is a research method based on the empirical experience of the author while practicing as an advocate at the Purwokerto Religious Court Legal Aid Post throughout 2018. The results of the study show that the process of issuing a certificate of absence is hampered by the absence of standard operating procedures, which leads to allegations of maladministration in the form of prolonged delays. In turn, those seeking justice are unable to file for divorce at the Purwokerto Religious Court.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Ali, Zainuddin. 2009. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta. Sinar Grafika.
  2. Darmawan, Aldy & Izzati, Nurul. Implementasi Pemanggilan Perkara Cerai Ghaib di Pengadilan Agama Pariaman Kelas I B. Jurnal Sakena. Vol. 7 No. 2, Tahun 2022.
  3. Desiana, Ayu. Analisis Konsep Pengawasan Ombudsman Terhadap Penyelenggaraan Pelayanan Publik. Jurnal Inovatif. Vol. 6 No. 2 Tahun 2013.
  4. Fadhilah. Relaas Melalui Siaran Radio dan Surat Tercatat (Studi di Mahkamah Syari’ah Bireuen). Jurnal Al- Mizan. Vol. 11, No. 2. Desember 2024.
  5. Hasan, Nurhayati M. dan Ishak, Ajub. Putusan Hakim atas Perceraian Salah Satu Pihak Ghaib dan Impilkasinya Terhadap Para Pihak di Pengadilan Agama Limboto, Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Jauhari, Vol. 3 No. 2 September 2018.
  6. Independent News 45. Desa Rajeg Klarifikasi Surat Keterangan Ghaib, Tegaskan Pelayanan Publik Jadi Prioritas, https://www.independentnews45.com/2025/05/desa-rajeg-klarifikasi-surat-keterangan.html diakses 15 September 2025.
  7. Muhaimin. 2020. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Mataram University Press. Nusa Tenggara Barat.
  8. Muhammad, Abdulkadir. 2004. Hukum dan Penelitian Hukum. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.
  9. Nur, Dwi Utami Hidayah. Efektivitas Pemanggilan Melalui Media Massa Terhadap Tergugat yang Tidak Diketahui Keberadaannya (Ghaib) di Pengadilan Agama. Jurnal Qisthosia. Vol.3, No.2 Desember 2022.
  10. Oktavira, Bernadetha Aurelia. Kekuatan Surat Pernyataan dalam Hubungan Kerja, https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/kekuatan-surat-pernyataan-dalam-hubungan-kerja-lt5c4699c7d63a1/. Diakses 25 Juli 2025
  11. Ristianawati, Eka. Problematika Cerai Ghoib dan Upaya Hukumnya. Syntax Admiration, Vol. 5, No. 8, Agustus 2024. Hlm. 2945
  12. Soekanto, Soerjono. 1996. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta. UI Press.
  13. Sugiyono. 2010. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta, Bandung.
  14. Tan, David. 2021. Metode Penelitian Hukum: Mengupas dan Mengulas Metodologi Dalam Menyelenggarakan Penelitian Hukum. Nusantara. Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial. Vol. 8 (8).
  15. Waluyo, Bambang. 1996. Penelitian Hukum Dalam Praktek. Sinar Grafika. Jakarta.
Home Current Archives New Journal Search